CHEATING FORGERY LAW LEGAL CASES SECRETS

cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets

cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets

Blog Article

III)     While in the version in the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second version) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed for the petitioner and others was simple presence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.

Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life as well as importance of maintaining law and order in society.

Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC provides for the death penalty since the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender may very well be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been in the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be matter to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case on the petitioners for promotion may be considered, however, we've been obvious within our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, issue to availability of vacancy subject matter to your approval on the competent authority.

The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive piece of legislation that defines several criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for those found guilty.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, it is also a nicely-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.

Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there might be one or more judgments supplied (or reported). Only the reason with the decision in the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may very well be adopted in an argument.

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے read more حکم جاری کیا ہے................

Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common legislation, is really a law that is based on precedents, that could be the judicial decisions from previous cases, rather than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.

This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station resulting from possible health risks and dangers.

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight presented to any reported judgment may well rely upon the reputation of both the reporter and also the judges.[7]

To invoke section 300 and 302 just because death has occurred is the greatest tragedy of all. It does the exact opposite of what a legal system is there to carry out, i.e. safe its citizens.

90 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is usually important to note that neither seniority nor promotion could be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion can be claimed or granted without the actual size of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for getting entitled to get viewed as for promotion to some higher quality, of course, will not be without logic since the officer that's originally inducted to a particular post needs to provide about the reported post to gain experience to hold the next higher post also to serve the public in a befitting way.

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children inside the home. The boy was placed in an emergency foster home, and was later shifted all over within the foster care system.

Report this page